The Big Bang - goes up in smoke!

THERE ARE TWO REASONS WHY THE "BIG BANG" THEORY OF THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE CANNOT BE BELIEVED

1. It is not good science and scientists are beginning to speak up about this.

2. It is not good theology and Christians need to think very hard about this.

In the May 22, 2004 issue of New Scientist, an open letter to the scientific community is written - mainly by SECULAR scientists (i.e. they do not believe in the Bible's account of creation). In this letter they challenge the theory of the origin of the uiverse by a Big Bang - the explosion of energy and the beginning of an ever expanding universe. These scientists state clearly that the vast number of arbitrary assumptions and the lack of successful big bang predictions challenge the the theory of the big bang as one that can be taken seriously.

Here is a quote from what they wrote...

The big bang today relies on a growing number of hypothetical entities, things that we have never observed—inflation, dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples. Without them, there would be a fatal contradiction between the observations made by astronomers and the predictions of the big bang theory. In no other field of physics would this continual recourse to new hypothetical objects be accepted as a way of bridging the gap between theory and observation. It would, at the least, raise serious questions about the validity of the underlying theory.

This statement has SINCE been signed by hundreds of other professors and scientists at various institutions. The Big Bang theory is an unscientific and unsuccessful attempt to replace the biblical explanation of the creation of the universe by God.

A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE "BIG BANG" AND "CREATION"

When you take an honest look at the source information on Creation and the Big Bang, there is no way you can make the Big Bang theory fit with the way the Bible says God created the world.

For example:

The Big Bang theory says the universe was formed over billions of years.

The Bible says it was created in six days.

The Big Bang says that stars existed billions of years before the earth.

The Bible says the stars were created three days after the earth.

Have a look at the chart below and see how different these two beliefs are.

Note the different time in which the EARTH and the STARS arrived in these two explanations.

BIG BANG: Billions of years - STARS come before EARTH

BIG BANG	STARS	SUN	MOLTEN EARTH	FIRST OCEANS
15 Billion Years Ago	10 Billion Years Ago	5 Billion Years Ago	4.5 Billion Years Ago	3.8 Billion Years Ago

CREATION: 6 days - EARTH created before STARS

WATER COVEREDEARTH	DRY LAND & PLANTS	SUN MOON &STARS	SEA & FLYING CREATURES	LAND ANIMALS & HUMANKIND
Days 1-2	Day 3	Day 4	Day 5	Day 6

The above illustration is only a small example of how different these two views on the origin of the universe are.

From this illustration it can be seen that it is not possible to believe the Bible account of the origin of the universe & the Big Bang theory at the same time. Not only do they simply not match, but a growing number of recognised scientists are also saying that the Big Bang cannot be presented as a valid scientific theory.

For the Christian however, what the scientists say here is not actually all that important. The fact is that if you believe the Bible to be the true inspired Word of God, then you can believe and trust what God says about how he created the universe.

i.e earth first, stars two days later.

But did the Bible mean a "literal" day or could DAY be equal to millions of years?

The Bible explains itself on this. In the Scriptures below, a "day" in the Genesis account of creation is a literal 24 hour period because after each creation period, the Bible says in very specific terms that there was evening and then morning and then the next day began (Genesis 1:13). In addition to this, in the second book of the Bible when God gives the ten commandments to his people we read in Exodus 20:11-12,

"But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: 11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it."

In the passage quoted above, GOD is speaking to his people. Therefore, to say that the Bible doesn't teach that God made the world in six literal days is to call God a liar! It was God who told his people to rest on the seventh day from their labours as he rested on the seventh dayfrom creating the world. The same word for "day" is used in these two verses as it is in Genesis chapters one and two.

SCROLL DOWN TO SEE THE FULL ACCOUNT OF SIX DAY CREATION.

ONE DAY YOU WILL MEET THE CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE!

CLICK HERE

TO SEE IF YOU WILL BE GOOD ENOUGH TO ENTER HEAVEN

Creation - 6 Days not millions of years

Genesis 1:1-31

[DAY 1]

1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 The earth was formless and void, and darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was moving over the surface of the waters. 3 Then God said, “Let there be light”; and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good; and God separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light day, and the darkness He called night. And there was evening and there was morning,one day.

[DAY 2]

Then God said, “Let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters.” 7 God made the expanse, and separated the waters which were below the expanse from the waters which were above the expanse; and it was so. 8 God called the expanse heaven. And there was evening and there was morning, a second day.

[DAY 3]

Then God said, “Let the waters below the heavens be gathered into one place, and let the dry land appear”; and it was so. 10 God called the dry land earth, and the gathering of the waters He called seas; and God saw that it was good. 11 Then God said, “Let the earth sprout vegetation, plants yielding seed, and fruit trees on the earth bearing fruit after their kind with seed in them”; and it was so. 12 The earth brought forth vegetation, plants yielding seed after their kind, and trees bearing fruit with seed in them, after their kind; and God saw that it was good. 13 There was evening and there was morning, a third day.

[DAY 4]

Then God said, “Let there be lights in the expanse of the heavens to separate the day from the night, and let them be for signs and for seasons and for days and years; 15 and let them be for lights in the expanse of the heavens to give light on the earth”; and it was so. 16 God made the two great lights, the greater light to govern the day, and the lesser light to govern the night; He made the stars also. 17 God placed them in the expanse of the heavens to give light on the earth, 18 and to govern the day and the night, and to separate the light from the darkness; and God saw that it was good. 19 There was evening and there was morning, afourth day.

[DAY 5]

Then God said, “Let the waters teem with swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth in the open expanse of the heavens.” 21 God created the great sea monsters and every living creature that moves, with which the waters swarmed after their kind, and every winged bird after its kind; and God saw that it was good. 22 God blessed them, saying, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let birds multiply on the earth.”23 There was evening and there was morning, a fifth day.

[DAY 6]

Then God said, “Let the earth bring forth living creatures after their kind: cattle and creeping things and beasts of the earth after their kind”; and it was so. 25 God made the beasts of the earth after their kind, and the cattle after their kind, and everything that creeps on the ground after its kind; and God saw that it was good.

Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” 27 God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. 28 God blessed them; and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it; and rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over every living thing that moves on the earth.” 29 Then God said, “Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the surface of all the earth, and every tree which has fruit yielding seed; it shall be food for you; 30 and to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the sky and to every thing that moves on the earth which has life, I have given every green plant for food”; and it was so. 31 God saw all that He had made, and behold, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day.

Genesis 2:1-3

[DAY 7]

1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. 2 And on theseventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. 3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.

Compare with Exodus 20:11-12

"But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: 11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed thesabbath day, and hallowed it."

6 DAYS, NOT BILLIONS OF YEARS

The world will end in 2012, say experts

SCIENTIFIC EXPERTS from around the world are predicting that five years from now, all life on Earth could well come to an end. Some are saying it’ll be humans that would set it off. Others believe that a natural phenomenon will be the cause. And the religious folks are saying it’ll be God himself who would press the stop button. The following are some likely arguments as to why the world would end by the year 2012.

Reason one: Mayan calendar

The first to predict 2012 as the end of the world were the Mayans, a bloodthirsty race that were good at two things -- building highly accurate astrological equipment out of stone and sacrificing virgins.

Thousands of years ago they managed to calculate the length of the lunar moon as 329.53020 days, only 34 seconds out. The Mayan calendar predicts that the earth will end on December 21,2012. Given that they were pretty close to the mark with the lunar cycle, it’s likely they’ve got the end of the world right as well.

Reason two: Sun storms

Solar experts from around the world monitoring the sun have made a startling discovery. Our sun is in a bit of strife. The energy output of the sun is, like most things in nature, cyclic and it’s supposed to be in the middle of a period of relative stability. However, recent solar storms have been bombarding the earth with lot of radiation energy. It’s been knocking out power grids and destroying satellites. This activity is predicted to get worse and calculations suggest it’ll reach its deadly peak sometime in 2012.

Reason three: The atom smasher

Scientists in Europe have been building the world’s largest particle accelerator. Basically, its a 27 km tunnel designed to smash atoms together to find out what makes the universe tick. However, the mega-gadget has caused serious concern, with some scientists suggesting that it’s properly even a bad idea to turn it on in the first place. They’re predicting all manner of deadly results, including mini black holes. So when this machine is fired up for its first serious experiment in 2012, the world could be crushed into a super-dense blob the size of a basketball.

Reason four: The Bible says it

If having scientists warning us about the end of the world isn’t bad enough, religious folks are getting in on the act as well. Interpretations of the Christian Bible reveal that the date for Armageddon, the final battle between good an evil, has been set for 2012. The I Ching, also known as the Chinese Book of Changes, says the same thing, as do various sections of the Hindu teachings.

Reason five: Super volcano

Yellowstone National Park in United States is famous for its thermal springs and old faithful geyser. The reason for this is simple -- it’s sitting on top of the world’s biggest volcano and geological experts are beginning to get nervous sweats. The Yellowstone volcano has a pattern of erupting every 650,000 years or so, and we’re many years overdue for an explosion that will fill the atmosphere with ash, blocking the sun and plunging the earth into a frozen winter that could last up to 15,000 years. The pressure under the Yellowstone is building steadily, and geologists have set2012 as a likely date for the big bang.

Reason six: The physicists

This one’s case of bog -- simple maths mathematics. Physicists at Berkely University have been crunching the numbers. They’ve determined that the earth is well overdue for a major catastrophic event. Even worse, they’re claiming that their calculations prove that we’re all going to die, very soon. They are also saying that their prediction comes with a certainty of 99 per cent; and 2012just happens to be the best guess as to when it occurs.

Reason seven: Earth’s magnetic field

We all know the Earth is surrounded by a magnetic field that shields us from most of the sun’s radiation. What you might not know is that the magnetic poles we call North and South have a nasty habit of swapping places every 750,000 years or so -- and right now we’re about 30,000 years overdue. Scientists have noted that the poles are drifting apart roughly 20-30 kms each year, much faster than ever before, which points to a pole-shift being right around the corner. While the pole shift is under way, the magnetic field is disrupted and will eventually disappear, sometimes for up to 100 years. The result is enough UV outdoors to crisp your skin in seconds, killing everything it touches.

The Bast Theory

Prelude

There are two obvious camps whenever Ancient Mysteries are debated - those that cite a lack of hard physical evidence, and those that trust their instincts. Prime examples are the pyramids and flood myths. These were global phenomenons in ancient times, and the similarities appear obvious to the layman, which is why so many books on the subjects are published and sold. Serious academics, who went through university adhering to strict scientific principals, will argue that there isn't enough evidence to show that ancient societies were in contact with each other. Flood myths apparantly arose from local flooding, and global pyramids... it's all just a coincidence, they say.

It is as if 100 people witnessed a murder, and knew the murderer personally. The murderer fled. Each witness told their children, who in turn told their children. Amazingly, two generations later, the murderer returns to hand himself in. Hundreds of grandchildren of the original witnesses know who he is and that he is guilty, because of the details they had been told. But he will not be punished, because there is no physical evidence, and no original witnesses.

There is little likelihood of anything surviving the ravages of time unless it was specifically designed to do so. Even today, we are finding that we are unable to contain nuclear waste forever, and settle for a few hundred years of safety ( see here ). Ancient texts like the Dead Sea Scrolls have come to us only through a fluke of circumstances.

In the search for answers I have decided that starting with evidence and then developing theories is the wrong path. There is unlikely to ever be enough definitive evidence, and if there was, scientists and academics are the best qualified to do so. So I have begun with a theory, based on instinct and obviousness, and am now trying to gather enough proof to convince the majority of humans that are sane, regular people. I have little desire to change the opinions of academics, but I have respect for some of their methods and standards - where appropriate I will choose to quote academics over laymen, and as much as possible I will provide verifiable references for anything I find. Which means any mentions of Zacharia Sitchin or Erich von Daniken are unlikely, regardless of how well meaning and intelligent they appear to be.

I also choose not to mention UFOs. I wouldn't be too surprised if we had alien visitors from time to time, but evidence is lacking. And it would be difficult for me to remain a non-fiction author with the number of possibilities they allow.

In its purest form my theory is based on these assumptions:The Starting Point

• Ancient cultures communicated with each other in some way
• Mysterious Elders have appeared from time to time to guide us
• Pyramids and mounds had a purpose other than burying royalty
• Evolution doesn't generally occur in small stages
• Global cataclysms have occurred within the last 12,000 years
• Our galactic neighbourhood could be more dangerous than is commonly acknowledged

These assumptions are certainly not unique, and many books have been written on each, with perhaps the last being debated less often than the others.

The Theory

In One Sentence: Every so often a force from space causes global cataclysms and mass mutations.

• The Anicent Mayan Calendar ends in 2012. We would be very foolish to ignore this warning, a doomsday date that may have been given to the Maya by others
• Pole shifts have occurred in the past and will occur again. There is no known terrestial mechanism that can cause pole shifts, so the trigger could well be extra-terrestial. With the universe being the mystery that it is, we should accept that anything is possible.
• Mass extinctions and rapid evolution occur at the same time as cataclysms. Rapid evolutionary change can only be achieved via extremely high rates of mutations, and by mutations that are not random. Unicorns and dragons once actually existed, they were mutant strains that didn't survive very long.
• Cosmic rays cause mutations. A huge influx of cosmic rays would cause high rates of mutations. Although scientists are unsure about where all the cosmic rays come from, the source might be the same as what powers the pole shifts.
• The ancients were aware of the dangers of cosmic rays and cataclysms and encoded information about them into their calendars, myths and monuments. I also believe that pyramids may have been designed as cosmic ray shelters.

All of these topics are, or will be, dealt with in-depth within these pages.

Why am I investigating these ideas?

As a human it is not surprising that I like humans. I don't want them to be wiped out. And I prefer them just how they are, as opposed to any mutant strain that might occur. The Mayan end-date is not far off, and if it happens to be the date of the next cataclysm, I would like to help some of us to prepare, and survive.

21.12.2012. End of time. End of the world.

Home -- Book Forward

21.12.2012. End of time. End of the world. The end of Mayan Long Count. The apocalypse. The end of Kali Yuga. The winter solstice 2012 is not just any solstice but the solstice of all solstices. It is the Great Solstice - a solstice of the precessional or Platonic year. It is the fountain of all solstices and all equinoxes from which the life flows and cascades from a season to season. It is the source from which the time to which we owe our existence gushes out. And it is also a payback time when such existence must be justified. Did the gift of life, which was bestowed the last time around, fulfill its purpose? What does the end date of Mayan Long count indicate? What will happen on 21.12.2012? Will it be what Tom, Harry or Sally thought and put forward in their theories or will it be what it must be? What does this date truly indicate? Is it negotiable? It indicates the end of the present order and it is NOT negotiable. 21.12.2012 is an appointment with destiny. It is an apocalypse and ascension. It is the end of the world, as we know it - nothing more and nothing less. It is a complete and comprehensive destruction of the age of Kali as a dominant force shaping all aspects of life, which is preceding the dawn of a new Golden age. Did not you know that every transformation and establishment of a new order is unfolded through the destruction of the old order? Did not you know that every action must have an equal and opposite reaction? Did not you know that everything that exists must be born and it must die? Did not you know that new life is created through death and death through life? Did you think that you would never die? Did you really think that time is infinite? Well, it doesn't really matter what anyone thought because truth is not affected by such idle theories at least. To think is not to know. The winter sun 2012 ushers into 72 days of upheavals in which the chaos following a destruction of the old order will reign before the new order is firmly set in place.

Is it going to be destruction similar to the one in Noah's time 5200 years ago or as the one in which Atlantis and many other parts of the world were obliterated 10400 years ago? No, because such destructions were only partial, allowing the seeds of the past to infiltrate the new age (see biblical book of Daniel). 21.12.2012 will be a complete; hence destruction on a much larger scale, because it is not only the birth of one out of five ages of the same precessional cycle but also the birth of a brand new precessional age. It is the birth of a larger creative cycle than the past four events and will trigger a correspondingly larger degree of destruction since the larger birth is also a more painful birth. The winter solstice 2012 will not be just a change of civilizations as in the past. It is a more essential change. It is the change of the race of man similar to the one 26000 years ago in which the Neanderthal race could not justify its existence. It stipulates the demise of the present race supporting its life through the brutalities of Kali and ushering into existence a future race thriving on justice of the Golden age (Ma'at). Is it the time of ascension? It is certain ascension only for the earth. The certain planetary ascension creates only a possibility for ascension of man and all the life in the earth's environment. It depends on the level of adaptation to such new environment whether man will follow the suit.

The eventual ascension depends on the degree of harmony between man and his environment. It depends on the amount of concord existing between the spirit of man and the spirit of his creator. It depends whether his heart and his mind converge or diverge. It depends whether man's life has a purpose or not. The ascension of man is conditional upon his willingness to accept the truth and the immutability of the upcoming change. The ascension of Earth is impersonal but ascension of man is a personal responsibility. A bend in the road will be the end of the road for the present race unless it is willing to make a righteous turn. Will one make a turn if one cannot even see the bend? How can one see what lays ahead if one is only willing to look back? Is there a future in the past? Remember that although all are invited, only few are chosen, because only few are willing to accept the invitation. Only few have the time and will to see the grand scheme of life. Only few are willing to sacrifice the personal illusion of the world and embrace the world's impersonal truth. Only few are willing to exchange their unjust beliefs for the just truth. One's life is one's personal responsibility. The ascension of life is a personal responsibility to act in time. It is not an ascent but a descent, which is a choice by default to act consciously. Kali must harvest what Kali planted in an age of Kali. Any different outcome requires a personal effort.

Life is a personal responsibility because the creator creates through his creations. It is a personal choice to open the eyes or to keep them shut. It is a personal choice to accept or to reject the gift of life. Who is the one who chooses one's own destiny if not you? One will drown under the weight of unjust personal beliefs unless one is unburdened by the personal acceptance of an impersonal and just truth. One can float in the river of life only if his burden is not heavier than the feather of Maat. One can either repent or persist in his beliefs and the injustice he dishes on the world around him. Survival is a matter of adaptation. How can one adapt to what one is not even conscious of? The adaptation to personal beliefs is not an adaptation but a dead end road. The sustainability of life corresponds to its adaptation to the impersonal truth. Life must be just to be justified by its environment and the justice must be impersonal to be equal for all. Can a father be just if he favors only one of his many sons? The belief is always only a half-truth, which is creating intolerance and injustice. The half-truth is a deceit. The half-truth is worst than a lie, because it lies about the truth as much as it lies about the lie. Only the truth is just and wholesome. A world built on the beliefs is an ignorant world of Kali who rules through the deceits of half-truths. You can choose to embrace the new and just age by acting now or you can choose by default of acting now to follow its demise with the winter sun of 2012. Creation of life is a conscious effort that requires a coherent action. Only the decay and death happen by default.

It is not a question of what will happen on the winter solstice 2012 but what will you do about it. One is a certainty over which you have no control but the other is a freedom of choice. Will you be physically and spiritually ready or will the unfolding events catch you like a proverbial thief in the night? It is a free world. No one can or will be coerced. It is a personal liability to accept the impersonal truth. It is a personal choice whether unfolding events will predetermine one's own destiny or whether one will determine it by manipulating the events. It depends on the degree of one's awareness and that depends on his willingness to adapt. Alternatively, it depends on one's willingness to abandon personal beliefs and embrace the impersonal truth. It depends on the resistance the spirit offers to the changing environment. It depends on the weight of the heart. One must overcome the personal inertia or be overcomed by it. One either lives or dies. 21.12.2012 is the Judgment Day because only the life that is just and balanced with its environment will overcome it. Only the spirit that is in tune with the Higher Will will be justified. The twisted personal notions of justice do not determine the meaning of justice. On the contrary! That which is balanced and coherent is just. It is impersonal. It has absolutely nothing in common with anything that we might think or feel to be just (or not). The just is what is adaptable to environment and in tune with the Higher Will. The just is what is in tune with its purpose. The purposeless and selfish existence is unjust. See the world around you and all your questions about its usefulness and the kind of justice it serves should be answered.

If you want to heal the world, give it justice. Not an illusion of justice according to the subjective personal beliefs what constitutes love and fear but the real impersonal justice! World doesn't need the impotent projection of the passive love but a potent doses of the active love. It doesn't need an immaterial and inconsequential love but a tangible material love. The world needs the active creation and not the passive destruction to be healed. The fear of dispensing the real love in a disguise of projecting some imaginary love is nothing but a total absence of love that will only accelerate the decay and death of this world. The world needs the just and impersonal love - not an unjust and selfish love, which is not the love at all and it has no creative potential but serves the same destructive purpose as the fear. Love that is incapable of stirring tangible action is an abdication of love in the face of fear and has no creative purpose because it doesn't urge an adaptation to the truth; hence it doesn't stimulate an increase in awareness or the proliferation of life. An unjust personal love is selective, selfish and intolerant and it is anything but love in its inactivity. The love appears as fear and the fear as love in a world dominated by the sheer brutality of an age of Kali, which is promulgating inactivity, decay and chaos.

Would it be the justice to retain something that is unjust by its nature? Is it of any use to keep something that is useless? One cannot be of use to oneself but only to that that is outside of oneself. The purpose of a rudder is to steer the boat - it has no value if detached and on its own. What is the use of an unjust and selfish world, because it has no creative power? What is the use of a purposeless existence? Does it have the power to sustain itself when faced with its purpose? Can one's existence be justified when faced with one's creator on the day of the Lord? Can one offer a purpose in exchange for a given life? Can one repent the injustice fostered by the partiality of beliefs and accept the justice of truth? Can one adapt and justify his continued existence? Or is one's heart too inflexible and too heavy with the injustice? Apocalyptic 42-day passage of earth though a black hole of time that will start with winter sun of 2012 requires the clarity and justice of all life on earth. Why? Because only the justice is coherent; hence only the justice has a creative power of life. The injustice is incoherent randomness that is devoid of any power because all its selfish and isolated parts act against each other. The justice is not optional. It is the very essence of life. Life feeds on it.

The following is my testimony to the world, given to you as it was given to me and presented to the best of my ability. You can accept or reject it, use it or ignore it wholly or partially, remembering that every action or lack of it is commensurate with an appropriate reaction. Keep in mind that consequence of an action (or lack of it) outweighs the action alone. The truth is not negotiable but its perception is; hence one's awareness should always be a step ahead of the perception alone. Be ready to face the truth when its perception dissolves on the winter solstice 2012. You've been told in no uncertain terms by the ancient people of Sumer, Egypt, Vedantic India, by the traditions of Native Americans, by Maya, through the Biblical and Taoist traditions, yet you still choose to negotiate what is non-negotiable. You still prefer to veil an impersonal and just truth with the personal and unjust beliefs. You've chosen to veil the justice in many layers of injustice by believing that injustice is the justice and that justice is the injustice. You've coated the truth with many layers of deceit thinking that a deceit is the truth and that a truth is the deceit. Your religions and your science will reveal to you the same truth of an impersonal justice if you will but see it in an honest and just interpretation and free of the subjective and misleading beliefs. The world out there in all its multihued manifestations is staring you in the face, yet you are too afraid to stare back at it, preferring a selfish and impotent isolation instead of a mutual interaction and creation. The world offers you life, yet you are paralyzed with the terror thinking that life is death and that death is life.

It is one of the final testaments given to the world that the truth is not what one believes or theorizes. It is exactly what it is. It needs no interpretation. It has a very precise meaning and an exact purpose and so do any of its forms and manifestations. The truth is in the absence of all beliefs and disbeliefs. It is impersonal and just. This is one of the final rebukes before a final trumpet call on the winter solstice 2012 when the Maya Long count ends - and so does this world of Kali built on the illusions and injustice. Remember, it is an impersonal message - it doesn't matter whether you accept or reject it. It does not matter whether you see it as the fear mongering or as the love and concern for preservation of the fellow man. All that matters is the effect. All that matters is the action. If the love will lull you into inaction but the fear will stir you into action, let it be the fear, but if the fear will paralyze you into inaction; let it be the love, since love and fear are two personal faces of an impersonal truth. The heaven knows better than what we believe to be the love or the fear. The heaven knows that the true love is a just love and that an unjust love has the same purpose as an unjust fear. The rest of the text on this page is a preparation for what is to follow and unless one mastered it in its impersonal form, there would be little benefit of proceeding to the other pages. The truth is quantized in hierarchical sequences - it evolves step by step and one can proceed to the next step only if he is firmly footed on the previous step. Confusion will replace the understanding unless this advice is followed. One will stumble trying to manage several steps at once. It will become an obstacle for the next step thus defeating its purpose unless the step before is mastered.

Every step can confuse as much as it can enlighten because the justice is impersonal. The impersonal justice can be accepted in two conflicting personal forms - both of them serving the same ultimate purpose of building a stepped pyramid to the heaven with an apex on 21.12.2012. The pyramid is smooth only on the surface or from afar. The smooth texture of an outer macrocosm is built on the foundation of many inner hierarchical microcosmic sequences and vice versa. The uninterrupted smoothness on one side and the hierarchy of separated sequences on another side are also two personal faces of one impersonal truth. The purpose of a dualistic perception is its underlying wholeness but also vice versa, just as the purpose of an impersonal justice is a personal injustice but also vice versa. One option follows another in the serial or parallel sequential order creating a perpetual embrace of spiraling yin/yang. The wisdom and understanding are the shadows of ignorance and confusion and vice versa because the perception is dual and one exist only in contrast of its opposite. One is purpose of another and they co-exist as two intertwined partial beliefs of only one truth. One learns only through its opposite, because it is its purpose. One succeeds through the failures and fails through the successes. One prevails by surrendering and surrenders by prevailing. One lives only if supported by death and dies only if supported by life. One cannot exist separately from its opposite. One cannot exist without a purpose; hence one cannot exist separately from an environment, which is supporting him. One cannot exist in a selfish isolation from the world and the higher consciousness, which is projecting it because one is the purpose and the future of the world and its higher consciousness but only if the world and attainment of the higher consciousness is also one's purpose and one's future. The justice must be served because it's the stuff the building blocks of life are made of. Only the decay and death will prevail in the absence of justice - the decay and death on which the life feeds because life coheres what is incoherent, unifies what is separated, orders what is random and justifies what is unjust.

One can write just a short sentence or an entire book, depending on how much one thirsts for the wisdom and understanding. It doesn't really matter how extensively the subject is dealt with as long as the thirst is quenched. Many have heard about the Mayan end date on the winter solstice 2012 but few know what it means indeed. Many conflicting theories have sprung, one author competing with another in a final race before it is all over. Many eloquent words were spoken, yet mystery remains as deep as ever. Many have sensed the truth beyond the genius of Maya but many more prefer to impose their personal views, uncomfortable with the facts staring them in the face. Many see a correlation between the knowledge of Maya and remains of the similar knowledge scattered all over the world. Others do not want to see it covering the fear of truth with the wishful thinking. What is a belief but an unsubdued fear? The truth dwells in every heart yet many prefer to reject it because in their fear the life appears as death and the death as life. In all honesty everyone should know the truth but many prefer deceitful beliefs to an honest truth in a dishonest world. It is the fear of truth, which is hiding behind the appearance of a justified belief. A world without the beliefs, suppositions and theories is an honest world that is free of fear. A world in which personal beliefs overshadow an honest truth is a brutal, loveless and unjust world of Kali. How can anyone dare to interpret the Mayan end date if they haven't got a clue what kind of knowledge they had? How can one interpret something that one has no understanding of? How can one figure out their calendars or the correlation between the astronomical cycles and the creative cycles of earth they imply, without knowing what they knew? If you do not understand the process than at least accept its honest results. Isn't the purpose to deceive one's heart when an end is interpreted as not really an end? Isn't the purpose to justify personal fears when the theories are put forward, in which the finality of the present order on 21.12.2012 is not really final? Is the suppression of truth beyond a layer of deceit not the purpose when a non-negotiable certainty is made to appear as a mere possibility?

The Mayan understanding of astronomical cycles and their correlation with the creative cycles of earth is beyond the grasp of modern science. How can one justly interpret such superior knowledge with such vastly inferior tools of modern science? Shouldn't one backtrack his misguided efforts and try to justify the modern age from a Mayan perspective rather than vice versa. How can the present savagery and spiritual barbarism do justice to the past refinement of thought? Is a cave man in a position to justify the refinements of French cuisine or the intricacies of game of chess? Why should it be presumed that a later age is somehow more advanced then the one before when the history clearly shows that an evolution is a two-way street and that reversals are just as often as are advances? Doesn't the law of relativity, which we should have digested by now, equalize both possibilities? Doesn't such an arrogant attitude disguises an underlying ignorance and projects the fear as a valid belief? Is it an honest interpretation serving justice to the wisdom of Maya or to the present age? An end that's not an end is a complete distortion of truth - it's a belief driven to a point of insanity. It is the suicidal use of a sword intended for the defensive purpose. Such insane interpretations do not clarify but obscure. They serve no justice. Mayan knowledge of cycles goes back to the times before man walked the earth or even before the present universe came into existence; hence they are not just the astronomical cycles of the present universe but also the cycles of time transcending its present incarnation and its presently visible size. The understanding Maya had goes beyond the horizons and boundaries imposed by the modern understanding, because they knew that all boundaries are relative and that a larger and more comprehensive reality lurks just beyond the horizons.

Relativity as formulated by A. Einstein and the subsequent quantum laws are only a rediscovery of the long lost wisdom known by the Maya and all over the ancient world. The Maya were just the last one to remember them. Those who understand that the fractality principle is the foundation of the Mayan time cycles will also know that the Sumerian division of a day into 24 hrs and an hour into 60 min, the Egyptian Sothic cycles or the Vedic Yugas are formulated on the same principles. They predict the same outcome, as does the Mayan Long count - the end on the winter solstice 2012. It is not this or that or maybe. The end means the end. They could not know such vast cycles of time that are transcending all the physical boundaries of the present universe just by the observations. How can one observe something that is beyond the means of physical observations? Physical observation was obviously only a secondary tool in the gathering of information. The primary tool was an abstract understanding that they gained through the spiritual maturity. Their knowledge of the cycles reveals an understanding not only of particular isolated astronomical cycles but also of the essential fractal pattern explaining how the different cycles recursively nest one within the other. They understood not only the cycles but also the cycle of all cycles. They understood with an utmost precision the underlying infinite polynomial structure reflected in every finite and particular cycle, form or manifestation. They knew the fractal causality of all cycles, which is the causal thread connecting all cycles as one. They knew the abstract pattern beyond all particular cycles.

They knew what everyone knew in the past lost long ago - that time of the world below reflects as space in the world above and vice versa. They understood space/time relativity. They knew that astronomical cycles are intrinsically connected with the cycles of creation on Earth because everything is connected with everything else into a coherent whole through an unbroken causal thread. It was no secret that everything reflects everything else, which is the truth revealed only recently by the contemporary physical theories such as the holographic principle, quantum tunneling, Everett's many worlds interpretation and the other principles of quantum physics. The ancient world understood that analogy and similarity reveals the larger truth. It is a common sense that the size of a cycle is proportional with its duration. The larger cycle must have a larger period of an uninterrupted evolution but it must also begin and end with a proportionally larger moment of creation and destruction. The cycles must end because all that has a beginning must also have an end. Everything has a beginning and an end because an infinite reality manifests only in the finite (quantized) forms. It is a dual world in which the finiteness of a form on one level is supported by its infinity on the next level. They can only co-exist in a symbiosis with each other. Everything must have the boundaries in space and in time, where boundaries of time (duration) are inversely proportional with the spatial boundaries (size). Where is the justice when ignorance in the age of Kali judges the lost wisdom of time? It is an abomination of justice. An honest truth is covered with many layers of deceit in the age of Kali ruled by the fearful materialistic and selfish beliefs. Just as the gold is found under many layers of dirt, even the truth will be found safely stored under many layers of deceit.

What are cosmic rays?

The base structure of all things is the atom. Atoms are full of movement, both internally (electrons orbiting the nucleus) and externally (interacting with other atoms). This movement creates kinetic energy that is measured in electron volts (eV). The atoms of the air we breathe move as fast as cannonballs and generate around 0.03 eV. They bounce into other atoms of air but, like bumper cars at a fairground, they don’t do much harm to each other.

Elsewhere we find atomic particles moving much faster than this, which create more heat and more energy. Electrons within the Sun’s plasma have up to 10,000 eV, and protons in the magnetosphere [*] are higher still, in the range of 10 - 100 million eV. [1] The atomic particles in the magnetosphere move at speeds of 400-800 kilometres per second.

This is all rather calm relative to the greater universe. Bombarding the Earth from light years away are the ions we call cosmic rays. [†] They can move close to the speed of light and can pack a walloping 50 joules of kinetic energy (3 × 10²⁰ eV). That’s the power of a cricket ball moving at 160 km/h, packed into the size of a sub-atomic particle.

Most cosmic rays are the nuclei of atoms (protons), ranging from the lightest to the heaviest elements in the periodic table. The lightest elements are the most common, with hydrogen (89%) and helium (10%) dominating, along with other light elements (lithium, beryllium and boron). A few will be medium elements like carbon or oxygen, with heavier elements becoming less and less common. This is a similar relative abundance to the elements within our solar system. [2]

In 1912 Austrian-American physicist Victor Hess found that his electroscope discharged more rapidly as he ascended in a balloon. He theorised that there must have been radiation entering our atmosphere from outer space, which he dubbed cosmic rays. In 1936 he was awarded the Nobel Prize for his discovery.Who discovered them?

Where do they come from?

Cosmic rays hit Earth from every direction, but this tells us nothing of the location of their original source. Because they are magnetically charged, any interaction with a magnetic field, even an extremely weak one, will change their path. They are constantly deflected by magnetic fields throughout the galaxy, until any clues to their origin is lost. (However, it is possible to trace cosmic rays in other regions of the galaxy by the electromagnetic radiation they produce). [3]

Within our local planetary system the solar wind creates a magnetic field of its own. This makes it difficult for cosmic rays to make it to Earth - there is a correlation between the peak of the sunspot cycle and fewer cosmic rays reaching Earth. [4]

We don’t know where all the cosmic rays come from. The Sun emits low energy cosmic rays, typically accompanying solar flares. But even if every star in the known universe created cosmic rays in a similar manner, they would only explain a fraction of them.

The majority are believed to come from supernova explosions [‡] , which occur approximately once every 50 years in our Galaxy. They either originate from the explosion itself, or are created by the shock waves interacting with the surrounding interstellar gas. This reasoning is based on the energy requirements for creating cosmic rays, with only supernovas being deemed powerful enough to make them. In both cases the ejected matter expands at supersonic velocities, accelerating nuclei from the material they pass through, transforming them into cosmic rays. [5]

Other sources could be neutron stars, radio galaxies, X-ray binaries (such as Cygnus X-3), active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and black holes.

To measure cosmic rays directly, before they have been slowed down and broken up by the atmosphere, particle detectors can be placed on spacecraft and high altitude balloons. [6] Or they can be detected indirectly on our planet’s surface. When cosmic rays collide with atoms in the upper atmosphere, they create secondary particles (pions, electrons, positrons) which shower down to the Earth, spreading out over hundreds of metres. A grid of a hundred or so detectors is used to sample this area. The more particles that are detected, the stronger the cosmic ray. The atomic number of the cosmic ray’s nucleus cannot be discovered using this technique, just statistics of size and frequency. The biggest registered so far, a 50-joule cosmic ray, was at a Utah desert observatory in October 1991. On average one of this size will enter our atmosphere every second.

The world’s biggest cosmic ray observatory is being built in Argentina and will be operational in 2004.

Cosmic rays of this size are labelled "ultra high-energy". To date, scientists have been unable to determine the limits of the cosmic-ray spectrum, simply because they lack a detector large enough. The more powerful the particle, the less common it is, and the larger a detector needs to be to spot it. So even when the galaxy is quiet, there may be much larger cosmic rays hitting Earth and going undetected.

Ultra high-energy cosmic rays are a puzzle for scientists. Astrophysicists have decided that only black holes of a billion solar masses would have the energy to create them. Because interaction with the universal microwave background (remnants of the Big Bang) causes them to lose energy, their source cannot be more than 30 million light-years away. But within our own galaxy there are no known mechanisms to create such powerful particles. [7] An obvious answer comes to mind that most scientists will have difficulty accepting, that something within our galaxy - that has yet to be observed - could create them.

It is understandably hard for us to recreate the conditions of the cosmos here on Earth. The most modern artificial vacuums do not come close to achieving the emptiness of space, which has a density as low as one atom per cubic centimetre. Because ultra high-energy cosmic rays move close to the speed of light, time-scale adds to the problem. If we could observe a cosmic ray for 10,000 years, from the particle’s point of view only one second will have passed [8] . Viewing it for a microsecond in a particle accelerator will not tell us much. The complicated electrical and magnetic fields of outer space add to the difficulties. So, even if we can estimate where cosmic rays come from, we have no idea how they are created. And the time scales are impossible to recreate. Guesses and theories abound. Definitive answers do not.

Is the rate of bombardment constant?

No. This is one reason why carbon dating (http://www.sigmaxi.org/amsci/articles/00articles/taylorcap2.html) (the carbon isotopes they measure are created by cosmic rays) is inaccurate, because it assumes that the rate is a constant, which is a typical gradualist way of looking at things. Evidence from a half-metre long stalagmite that grew between 45 000 and 11 000 years ago in a cave in the Bahamas, shows that the cosmic ray intensity for that period was double what it is today - see here or here for more info.

What happens when they hit earth?

The combined energy of all the cosmic rays approaching Earth is massive. Fortunately the atmosphere and magnetosphere [§] protect us from them as effectively as a slab of concrete four metres thick. Even so, when cosmic rays collide with atoms in the upper atmosphere, they release showers of gamma rays, X-rays and subatomic particles. Most of these secondary particles will make it to the Earth’s surface. And the most energetic fragments, although rare, are capable of penetrating miles underground. [9]

Atomic structures mainly consist of space - space between the nucleus and electrons, space between the individual atoms. Because of this, sub-atomic particles can travel a great distance before they collide with anything. Consequently most cosmic rays and secondary particles pass right through houses, trees, rocks, birds and humans. But a few will occasionally crash into atoms within these structures and beings. Don’t be too alarmed; this cosmic radiation is minor compared to the Earth’s natural background radiation, which in total hardly affects any of us at all anyway.

Thousands of rays and fragments pass through our bodies every minute. [10] Outside of the Earth’s atmosphere, where some satellites and astronauts roam, cosmic rays are very dangerous indeed - their sheer frequency means they can ionise electronic circuitry and mutate the genes of astronauts.

How dangerous is flying?

Altitude matters. Whether you are flying in an airplane or living at a high altitude such as Tibet - the amount of cosmic radiation your body must deal with is increased.

During solar radiation storms, passengers on jets flying nearer Earth's poles can get zapped with than the equivalent of 10 chest X-rays

A 1996 paper in the American Journal of Epidemiology examined the incidence of cancer among 2,740 Air Canada pilots. The group had a sharply higher incidence of four specific types of cancer compared to the general population: myeloid leukemia, astrocytoma, prostate cancer, and malignant melanoma.

• Myeloid leukemia is definitely associated with radiation exposure, and occurred in the Air Canada pilot group four times more frequently than in the general population. A Danish study also found an association between exposure to cosmic radiation and leukemia among aircrew - it was published in Lancet 1999; 354: 2029-31
• Astrocytoma (a type of brain cancer) occurred twice as often in the Air Canada pilot group as in the general population, and increased incidence has also been found in other studies of airline pilots.
• Significantly higher incidences of prostate cancer were found in both the Air Canada study and another study of British Airways pilots. Current thinking is that this might be related to electromagnetic radiation from weather radar and other avionics rather than from cosmic radiation.
• A study of female airline flight attendants in Finland and Denmark showed an increased incidence of breast cancer, and a study of male U.S. Air Force pilots showed they had significantly more genital and testicular cancer than non-flying USAF officers.

In 2000, the European Union introduced legislation which requires all European airlines to monitor cosmic radiation levels during flight and to inform aircrew of the possible health risks.

NASA says:

"Airline pilots, crew, and passengers definitely are hit by more cosmic radiation than someone on the ground. The radiation is stronger at higher altitudes, and especially over the poles. Individual flights are almost certainly not a problem, since the radiation will never get anywhere near the 2.5 millirem per hour maximum allowable radiation dose (OSHA) even for a 41,000 ft flight right over the poles. But it is possible that pilots and crew accumulate enough to slightly increase their cancer risk. A Finnish study showed a higher breast cancer rate for stewardesses than for non-stewardesses, but there are other environmental factors (air quality for instance) that could affect this.

The weight of shielding required to protect against this radiation would make these flights nearly impossible. So there's not really anything you can do except decide not to fly."

The invisible passenger : radiation risks for people who fly

"Yet to become a legal issue is the worry over cosmic radiation. According to the Federal Aviation Administration, at 12,000 m air travelers are exposed to as much as 265 times the radiation dose they receive on the ground. Some airlines take pregnant female flight attendants off airborne duties to avoid exposing the fetus to cosmic rays. Passengers who make a transpolar journey, like the new direct Hong Kong-New York routes operated by Continental Airlines, United Airlines and, from September, Cathay Pacific, receive on average the equivalent to three chest X rays. (The rays concentrate around the North Pole's magnetic attraction.) Five round-trips on these flight paths would put the traveler in excess of the recommended annual limit for exposure to radiation, experts say. Already, since the flights commenced in March, Continental and United have rerouted one each, Continental citing passenger health concerns, United radio interference from solar radiation. (United said last week it was canceling its flight from next month for business reasons.) Maria Blettner, head of Germany's Radiation Protection Commission, is finishing a large-scale mortality study on cancer among flight crews, which is examining the medical history of 22,000 pilots and 50,000 flight attendants. Results are due soon, but Germany's Cockpit Association, a professional organization of pilots and engineers, warns the findings will reveal breast-cancer rates among stewardesses may be twice as high, and skin-cancer rates up to 15 times as high as those of the general populace."

Should I worry?

Although you can’t feel them, cosmic rays, and/or their secondary particles, pass through you all the time. Mostly they won’t touch the sides. But, occasionally they will connect with one of your atoms, and, if your DNA repair system doesn’t kick in, you might in some way mutate. Standard theories of Darwinian evolution always mention random mutations, but rarely point out the mechanism behind them - cosmic rays are a leading cause.

At current levels, unless you are a pregnant frequent flier, there are many, many other factors in your daily life that do you more harm. But if the level of cosmic ray bombardment increases - as it has done in the past - it might be prudent to investigate ways of shielding yourself from them.

End Of The World Truth

End of Days are upon us, as the earth changes have already begun. According to St. Malachi, there is only one more Pope. He will follow our current pope, St Benedict XVI, and he will be known as "Peter of Rome". The Maya Calendar and the I Ching, both end exactly on December 21, 2012. The writing is on the wall. It is time to Pray!

END OF DAYS

JOHN HAGEE - THE FINAL WARNING

Signs of the Last Day - According to the Qur'an

Our Lady of Emmitsburg forewarns us of upcoming earth changes.

Good Luck in these trying times ahead! Remember that prayer will mitigate what is to come. Look for the two suns.